There are seven questions below. You need to pick any FOUR. Your choice. Discuss each…

There are seven questions below.  You need to pick any FOUR.  Your choice.  Discuss each of your four choices IN-DEPTH.  Make sure to cover the key elements:  Who, What, When, Where, Why and How. Your requirement is for each of the four responses to be between 300-words (approximately 2- pages)…make sure all grammar, spelling and punctuation are correct (they do count!).  Best of Luck….there are 25 points, of course, for each question.

QUESTIONS PICK ONLY 4 PLEASE

1. In the late 1800’s, Alfred Thayer Mahan created the concept of national superpowers based on how the British Empire was so successful during most of the 1800’s.  He was attempting to get the United States out of it’s isolationist point of view.  The United States did not truly become aware of Mahan’s philosophy until the Spanish-American War in 1898.  To become a superpower, Mahan came up with four pillars…they were the creation of a large merchant marine, the creation of a large navy to protect that merchant marine, sea lanes of communication (SLOCs) and the control of strategic coaling stations.  Explain each of these four pillars and what the United States did in reaction to them.  What is a SLOC and how does it impact England, the Middle East, Australia and Guadalcanal?  What happened during the Washington Conferences in the 1920’s in regards to numbers, sizes, and tonnage of battleships?  How do Mahan’s four pillars apply today (especially with the United States)?

2.  During World War I, the American forces almost arrived too late to change the outcome of the war.  However, Americans had participated in the war at an earlier stage as flyers with the French in the Lafayette Escadrille.  Discuss the use of these flyers and their impact on the war.  What key aircraft were used by all sides from the beginning the war?  How did the flyers solve the problem of the use of machine guns firing through their own propellers?  Make SURE to discuss at least four different types of aircraft.  What were Zeppelins and how were THEY used in combat? Name an “ace” from each side….NOT Rickenbacker or…the “Red Baron”.  What IS an “ace” anyway?

3.  Throughout the entire World War II in the Pacific, there was a constant battle between the US Army and the US Navy on tactics, strategy, and targets.  The “combatants” were Admiral Chester Nimitz and General Douglas MacArthur.  It finally came down to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the President to somewhat settle this problem.  The Navy was given the Central Pacific and the Army was given the Southern Pacific.  The US Marines supported both avenues.    What were the key events and places taken in battle by the Navy and Marines from 1943 to 1945…..and what were the key events and places taken in battle by the US Army and Marines during the same time period?  Why was MacArthur so fixated on the Philippines?  Why was the Navy so fixated on Okinawa and Iwo Jima?   

4.  During WWII, in the North African, Italian and Northern European Theaters, one of the most important moments was, of course, D-Day (6 June 1944).  Originally, British Field Marshall Sir Bernard Law Montgomery proposed that the landings in Normandy would be comprised of three beaches struck by four divisions.  It was later modified to use 5 beaches with the additional use of three Airborne divisions (two American and one British).  Why were the landings at Utah Beach so critical to the overall success of Operation Overlord (D-Day)?  Who was BG Teddy Roosevelt, Jr and what did he accomplish at Utah Beach?  What was significant about Cherbourg, St. Lo, Ste. Mere Eglise, Carentan and Caen?  What was significant about the Hedgerow country and how did the allies solve the problem it presented?

5.  One of the key events of the Korean Conflict (notice what I called it) was the landings at Inchon.  What is meant by “South to the Naktong…North to the Yalu”?  Why were the Inchon landings such a terrible risk for the UN allies?   What does this have to do with tides?  Why was General MacArthur relieved of command?  Did President Truman make a mistake doing this? Why did China get involved?  What is significant about the little town of Panmunjom?   What is a “MASH”?

6.  During the Vietnam Conflict (notice what I called it), a major event took place in 1968.  It was called the Tet Offensive.  What happened?  How did this impact the presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson?  How did this impact the Vietcong?  What did North Vietnam do in reaction to this event?  What was the impact on the conflict of Operations Linebacker I and II?  What happened at Khe Sanh (Marines)?

7.  Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm were executed in reflection of Iraqi Leader Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi Army’s invasion of Kuwait.  Why did Hussein consider Kuwait to be another province of Iraq?  What was so significant about Kuwait’s oil to the rest of the world…or was it?  What was the purpose of Operation Desert Shield?  What was the purpose of the United States Marine Corps during the 100 hours of Desert Storm?  How were they used and why (be careful here)?  What is the significance of the “Highway of Death?”  Why did President Bush stop the entire operation after only 100 hours?  What happen to Saddam Hussein after Desert Storm?

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

The following terms are taken from a combination of the lecture notes, lectures, and assigned…

 

The following terms are taken from a combination of the lecture notes, lectures, and assigned reading. Choose one of the terms below on the midterm to write about. There is NO extra credit for writing on more than five. A top scoring exam will consist of five well-written, thorough, lengthy responses. 

You must provide factual information relating to the person, event, or movement, etc. I am looking for enough detail and enough specificity so it is clear you have a solid grasp of the subject matter. Many students find it helpful to run through the 'who,' what' 'when,' 'where,' why,' 'how,' etc. prompts while writing. Remember, I do NOT expect you to know dates, unless it is helpful to you to do so, but beyond that I do expect a lot of detail and specificity in your responses. Take your discussion/analysis as far as it can go; define things, explain things, integrate other relevant topics.

In class we used the example of Martin Luther. This is certainly not the only way to approach it, nor is it necessarily an all-inclusive answer, rather it is meant to illustrate my general expectations: 

Martin Luther was raised in a strict Catholic family in Germany. In his early adult years, he became a monk in hopes of one day becoming a priest. As time went on Luther, became more disturbed with what he believed to be blatant errors, abuse, and overreaching on the part of the priests, bishops, all the way up the chain of authority in the Catholic establishment. To Luther, neither the Bible, nor any other authority vested the clergy in the Roman Catholic Church with the power and the divide between themselves and the masses they claimed. Luther also called attention to indulgences and cancellations of punishments. Indulgences were payments of certain amounts of money straight to the Catholic Church in exchange for a decrease or a flat out erasure of one's sin. A cancellation was a higher payment up front which served to cancel the person's sin debt, so to speak, free and clear. 

In 1517, Luther nailed what came to be known as the "95 Theses" to the Wittenberg Castle Church door in Germany. The "95 Theses" were a list of questions for debate that Luther posed to the Catholic Church. The importance of Luther's nailing the "95 Theses" was that it touched off the Protestant Reformation. Luther stood up to the Catholic establishment at a time when that Church's authority was rarely if ever questioned, its pronouncements were the final word. People did not question, they did not interpret, and they did not analyze. Those skills were seen as solely reserved for higher church authority. Pope Leo X excommunicated Luther from the Catholic Church in 1520 (in other words, severed his association and prohibited him from ever being part of it again).

The Catholic Church deemed Luther a "protestant." Soon after, Europe became divided along confessional and territorial lines. The religious turmoil of the period led to warfare within most states and between many. 

Remember, nothing occurs in isolation or in a vacuum. Tell me in detail what the part of the world was like at the time the term you are writing about existed. Here's a hint: when you are studying, read a couple of paragraphs before and a couple of paragraphs after the term in the textbook and in the notes you hopefully took during class. Integrate this information in your response to provide political, economic, and social context.

Finally, tell me why each term was significant or important. Think of it this way; “why do we care?” “why did we study this person, event, movement, etc.” Did they start a trend or a backlash to a movement? How would the world be different if this person did not exist, if this movement did not occur, etc. What did this person, movement, or event contribute to history or to our understanding of how the world works? Keep in mind, there can be more than one significance. As long as your answer is reasonable, you will get points. Do NOT simply say, for example, “Luther was important because he impacted history.” While this is a true statement I expect more than that for a quality answer. 

Please use complete sentences. 

Terms:

  

Simon Bolivar

Political Challenges of Western Hemisphere Nations in the Nineteenth Century

The Abolition of Slavery 

Development and Underdevelopment among Western Hemisphere Nations in the Nineteenth Century

Territorial Expansion of the United States in the Nineteenth Century

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

History 115Guidelines for Latin American Novel ReviewFor this assignment, you are to read a Latin…

 

History 115
Guidelines for Latin American Novel Review

For this assignment, you are to read a Latin American literary work and discuss the themes, topics, plot, etc. of a novel of your choice from a prominent Latin American novelist.  There are a multitude of novelists to select from, and I have a list of suggest authors and titles below these instructions, as well as a nuts-and-bolts video about the assignment.  The due date for this report is Friday, November 30 at 11:59 PM.  Please submit your review through Canvas, and submit your reviews in any of these formats: doc, docx,  or PDF (if you are using Apple Pages to compose your review, please convert your completed paper to docx or PDF before you submit it).  No late reviews will be accepted, all reviews must be submitted by November 30.  The report is to be 5-7 pages in length and is to be double-spaced.  Please use a title page (length of review does not include title page), however you do not need to include a works cited page.  This review will count as 20% toward your final grade. 

In terms of the content of the report, I am looking for two main points of discussion.  First, you should devote the first half of the report to a summary of the main points in the novel that you selected.  To help you to address this issue, consider some of these questions: Who are the main characters in the story?  What era is the story set in?  Which historical figures, if any, are present in the story?  What types of literary elements are present in the story (i.e. flashbacks, magical realism, first-person point of view, etc.)? 

As for the second point of discussion, this is where you analyze and discuss the various literary and historical elements of the story.  For example, how did this novel contribute to your understanding about Latin American culture and society?  How did this novel compare to your previous experiences with reading novels, especially those from American authors?  I encourage you to be creative with your response in this portion of the assignment.  Should you have any questions or concerns, please check with me, or feel free to consult your English instructors for any suggestions regarding literary elements.  Finally, I have some novel suggestions by various Latin American masters such as Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Isabel Allende, Mario Vargas Llosa, Carlos Fuentes, and many others.  You can select any of these titles, or another title from a suggested author from the list, or even a title and author not on the list.  I do request that you inform me of the book you have chosen before spring vacation before you begin writing your review.

Some books by Mario Vargas Llosa:

  • “The Storyteller”
  • “Death in the Andes”
  • “The War at the End of the World”
  • “The Bad Girl”
  • “Conversation in the Cathedral”
  • “The Green House”

Some books by Carlos Fuentes:

  • “Where the Air is Clear”
  • “Old Gringo”
  • “The Death of Artemio Cruz”

Some books by Gabriel Garcia Marquez:

  • “One Hundred Years of Solitude”
  • “The General in his Labyrinth”
  • “Love in the Time of Cholera”
  • “The Autumn of the Patriarch”
  • “Chronicle of a Death Foretold”

Some books by Isabel Allende

  • “The House of the Spirits”
  • "The Infinite Plan"
  • “Eva Luna”
  • “Daughter of Fortune”
  • "Portrait in Sepia"

Other suggestions:

  • “Men of Maize” by Miguel Angel Asturias
  • “Widows” by Ariel Dorfman
  • “Huasipungo” by Jorge Icaza
  • “Yawar Fiesta” by Jose Maria Arguedas
  • “Os Sertoes” by Euclides Da Cunha
  • “The Underdogs” by Mariano Azuela
  • “Imagining Argentina” by Lawrence Thornton
  • “El Indio” by Gregorio Lopez y Fuentes
  • “One Day of Life” by Manlio Argueta
  • “Birds Without a Nest” by Clorinda Matto de Turner
  • “Don Segundo Sombra” by Ricardo Guiraldes
  • “Testimony: Death of a Guatemalan Village” by Victor Montejo
  • “Broad and Alien is the World” by Ciro Alegria
  • “The Obscene Bird of Night” by Jose Donoso
  • “Explosion in a Cathedral” by Alejo Carpentier
  • “Kiss of the Spider Woman” by Manuel Puig
  • “I, the Supreme” by Augusto Roa Bastos
  • “In the Time of the Butterflies” by Julia Alvarez
  • “Distant Star” by Roberto Bolaño
  • “The Lizard’s Tail” by Luisa Valenzuela
  • "The Seven Madmen" by Roberto Arlt

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

Writing a Book ReportSummary:This resource discusses book reports and how to write them.Book reports are…

 

Writing a Book Report

Summary:

This resource discusses book reports and how to write them.

Book reports are informative reports that discuss a book from an objective stance. They are similar to book reviews but focus more on a summary of the work than an evaluation of it. Book reports commonly describe what happens in a work; their focus is primarily on giving an account of the major plot, characters, thesis, and/or main idea of the work. Most often, book reports are a K-12 assignment and range from 250 to 500 words.

Book reviews are most often a college assignment, but they also appear in many professional works: magazines, newspapers, and academic journals. If you are looking to write a book review instead of a book report, please see the OWL resource, Writing a Book Review.

Before You Read

Before you begin to read, consider what types of things you will need to write your book report. First, you will need to get some basic information from the book:

  • Author
  • Title
  • Publisher location, name of publisher, year published
  • Number of Pages

You can either begin your report with some sort of citation, or you can incorporate some of these items into the report itself.

Next, try to answer the following questions to get you started thinking about the book:

  • Author: Who is the author? Have you read any other works by this author?
  • Genre: What type of book is this: fiction, nonfiction, biography, etc.? What types of people would like to read this kind of book? Do you typically read these kinds of books? Do you like them?
  • Title: What does the title do for you? Does it spark your interest? Does it fit well with the text of the book?
  • Pictures/Book Jacket/Cover/Printing: What does the book jacket or book cover say? Is it accurate? Were you excited to read this book because of it? Are there pictures? What kinds are there? Are they interesting?

As You Read

While reading a work of fiction, keep track of the major characters. You can also do the same with biographies. When reading nonfiction works, however, look for the main ideas and be ready to talk about them.

  • Characters: Who are the main characters? What happens to them? Did you like them? Were there good and bad characters?
  • Main Ideas: What is the main idea of the book? What happens? What did you learn that you did not know before?
  • Quotes: What parts did you like best? Are there parts that you could quote to make your report more enjoyable?

When You Are Ready to Write

Announce the book and author. Then, summarize what you have learned from the book. Explain what happens in the book, and discuss the elements you liked, did not like, would have changed, or if you would recommend this book to others and why. Consider the following items as well:

  • Principles/characters: What elements did you like best? Which characters did you like best and why? How does the author unfold the story or the main idea of the book?
  • Organize: Make sure that most of your paper summarizes the work. Then you may analyze the characters or themes of the work.
  • Your Evaluation: Choose one or a few points to discuss about the book. What worked well for you? How does this work compare with others by the same author or other books in the same genre? What major themes, motifs, or terms does the book introduce, and how effective are they? Did the book appeal to you on an emotional or logical way?
  • Recommend: Would you recommend this book to others? Why? What would you tell them before they read it? What would you talk about after you read it?

Revising/Final Copy

Do a quick double check of your paper:

  • Double-check the spelling of the author name(s), character names, special terms, and publisher.
  • Check the punctuation and grammar slowly.
  • Make sure you provide enough summary so that your reader or instructor can tell you read the book.
  • Consider adding some interesting quotes from the reading.

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

The core assignment of this course is a documented research paper (6-8 pages double-spaced (title…

  

The core assignment of this course is a documented research paper (6-8 pages double-spaced (title page and bibliography do not count towards the page count, Times New Roman 12-point font).

· The paper should support a thesis statement with information gained from research or investigation.

· The paper will not be just a report presenting information but will be a paper that carefully examines and presents your own historical interpretation of the topic you have chosen and your interpretation of the information you have gathered.

· The paper may include consideration of problems and solutions, define key terms, or refute arguments against your thesis statement.

It will be important to choose a topic of interest to you.

· Approach this assignment with an open and skeptical mind, then form an opinion based on what you have discovered.

· You must suspend belief while you are investigating and let the discoveries shape your opinion. (This is a thesis-finding approach.)

· Once you have found your thesis, write the paper to support it.

You will use some of the following critical thinking skills in this process:

1. Choosing an appropriate topic, limiting the topic

2. Gathering information, summarizing sources

3. Analyzing and evaluating sources

4. Defining key terms

5. Synthesizing information, comparing and contrasting sources

6. Testing a thesis, making a historical argument, using refutation

7. Amassing support for a position

8. Documenting sources

Because this may be a longer paper than you have written before and a complex process is involved, it is recommended that you complete this paper using the following steps:

1. Choose a topic related to U.S. History after 1877 that you would truly like to explore and that you are willing to spend some time on. Your chosen topic should be focused. Pose a question that you really want to answer. You may want to begin with more than one topic in mind.

2. Do some preliminary reading on the topic(s). You may begin with the textbook, then further explore the information available. Refine your topic. Summarize your topic, your interest in the topic, the questions you want to answer, and a hypothesis you want to test.

3. Gather information from a variety of sources. Use a minimum of four sources for your paper, and at least one must be a primary source.

o Examples of primary sources are ones that are used in our discussion forums 2-8.

o They are sources that are contemporary to the times under investigation.

o An example of a secondary source is our textbook, though the textbook also contains excerpts of primary sources, which you may use as a source in your paper.

4. Outline the results of your research and the plan for your paper (you are not required to submit the outline).

5. Write the final draft and be sure to include a Works Cited List, and use the correct MLA documentation style.

Grade Rubric

INTRODUCTION & THESIS: Includes a clear thesis statement, an assertion or position. The topic is original and manageable in a short research paper. /15

FOCUS AND DEVELOPMENT: Body of the essay focuses on this thesis and develops it fully, recognizing the complexity of issues and refuting arguments in opposition to the thesis. /20

SUPPORT AND SYNTHESIS: Uses sufficient and relevant evidence to support the thesis (and primary points), including facts, inferences, and judgments. Quotes, summarizes, and paraphrases accurately and effectively–appropriately introducing and explaining each quote. /25

RESOURCES: Shows a clear understanding of the sources; has evaluated each source and used it appropriately. Uses a wide variety of sources reflecting significant research. /10

CONVENTIONS: Uses MLA format correctly; includes internal citations and a Works Cited list; is free of errors. /15

CORRECTNESS AND STYLE: Introduces the topic in an interesting way; shows critical thinking and depth of understanding; uses appropriate tone; shows sophistication in language usage and sentence structure. /15
 

TOTAL: 100

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

D1In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to the following questions:· Of the seven…

  

D1

In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to the following questions:

· Of the seven moral theories discussed

· Virtue Ethics – Aristotle (teleological) – Maintain a virtuous disposition. …

· Natural Law – Aquinas (teleological) – Base judgements on reason and logic. …

· Categorical Imperative – Kant (deontological) …

· Utilitarianism – Mill (teleological) …

· Theory of Justice – Rawls (deontological) …

· Prima Facie Duties – Ross (deontological)

· , which one do you consider to be the mostcompelling, and why?

· Which of the seven moral theories do you consider to be the least compelling, and why?

D2

In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to the following question:

· Explain John Stuart Mill’s theory of higher and lower pleasures: Are there any problems inherent in the theory?

· Overall, does Mill’s idea of higher and lower pleasures make sense to you? Why or why not?

D3

In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to ONE of the following questions:

· After reading the Gill essay, Discuss the logical point made by some opponents of PAS that it is impossible to be better off dead than alive. Even if the logical argument were sound, are there other reasons to claim that suicide for a terminally ill patient is morally justified?

· What worries does Velleman raise about appeals to dignity and autonomy in arguments over euthanasia? Do you agree or disagree with him on this issue? Why or why not?

D4

In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to the following questions:

· Leopold suggests that economics should not be our only concern when it comes to the use of land. To what extent should economic considerations play a part in our treatment of nature and the environment?

· Are there any situations in which economic concerns might trump environmental ones? If so, could you give an example?

D5

In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to the following questions:

· Do you relate more to the abolitionist or the retentionist position?

· What do you see as the two strongest supporting arguments for your position, and why?

D6

In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to the following questions:

· Prior to reading the text, how would you have defined terrorism?

· What is your understanding of terrorism now?

· How would you account for the huge amount of terrorism in the 20th and 21st centuries?

· What do you see as the ethically proper response to acts of terror?

D7

In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to ONE of the following questions:

· What do people spend money on that they either don't need or rarely use other than those things mentioned by Singer? What things might people be most easily convinced to do without, and why?

· Consider and discuss whether the Kantian argument for helping the vulnerable is more or less convincing than the traditional utilitarian arguments. What kinds of arguments would be the most likely to persuade people to help those in need?

· Does Peter Singer's greatest moral evil rule require that persons act in heroic ways or go above and beyond the call of duty as Arthur suggests? Explain your answer.

D8

In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to ONE of the following questions:

· Macedo distinguishes two possible ways, which he labels "humanitarian assistance" and "distributive justice," of seeking to improve the condition of the poor. Explain these two approaches to assisting the poor. Do you agree or disagree with them? Why or why not?

· Why does Macedo claim that cosmopolitan distributive justice "makes no sense"? Do you agree or disagree with him on this question?

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

You will also need to answer two discussion posts for prepared questions addressing larger historical themes. There…

You will also need to answer two discussion posts for prepared questions addressing larger historical themes. There will be at least five questions to lead the discussion. You must post responses for AT LEAST two, by the deadline in the Tentative Course Calendar. Discussion Post #2 will close on December 5, at 11:59 P.M.

Choose one of the following questions to answer. 

#1. The men who wrote the Constitution did not envision the active and continuing involvement of ordinary citizens in affairs of states. Describe the various ways in which ordinary citizens became involved in political concerns. 

#2. Some women worked in mills, relishing the freedom and independence they felt away from the farm for the first time, while others developed a cult of domesticity, thinking themselves free to not have to work outside the home. Compare the meaning of freedom for these two groups of women. Think back to women's roles in other chapters and compare the role of women during the market revolution with the "republican motherhood" role of women during the American Revolution. 

#3. Compare the economic policies of the American System with those of Alexander Hamilton. What was similar? What was different? How do you think Hamilton would have rated presidents like John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson?

#4. Discuss the relationship between masters and slaves in the American South. Did masters have all the power in this relationship, or did the enslaved exert some power? Points to consider include paternalism, the size of slaveholdings, slavery and the law, forms of slave resistance, and labor organization (task and gang systems).

#5. One of the debates within the antislavery crusade was colonization of African-Americans to Africa. Explain the various arguments for and against colonization. 

#6. Explain how the various parties reacted to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Be sure to discuss why the Whig Party failed, why the Democratic Party split, and why the Republican Party unified. How did each party view slavery and define freedom?

#7. What strategy did General Grant ultimately adopt to achieve victory for the Union, and why did he do so? Why was his strategy criticized?

#8. For whites, freedom, no matter how defined, was a given, a birthright to be defended. For African-Americans, it was an open-ended process, a transformation of every aspect of their lives and of the society and culture that had sustained slavery in the first place. Defend or disprove this argument.

These discussion posts need to be a minimum of 500 words. Your grades for discussion posts will be based on your ability to answer the questions, follow directions, make positive contributions to the discussion. Remember that discussion posts are not texts or tweets. Make an assertion and back it up with historical evidence. Be sure you answer the questions being asked, and go beyond repeating and confirming what others have written to provide a positive contribution. Use proper grammar- remember, you are contributing to a college-level class. Because you are required to participate in only two, your recorded scores will be your highest two that you earn.  In other words, if you post discussion answers for more than two questions, you will still have only two scores recorded toward your grade, but those two scores will be your two highest, rather than your first two.

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

Hey,I have comments from my instructor regarding my essay. ‘Twilight of the Idols by Nietzsche…

Hey,

I have comments from my instructor regarding my essay.   

"Twilight of the Idols by  Nietzsche "

below his comments

 There are some topics you raise that aren’t directly related to the main topic—his discussion of the “true world” and “four errors.” THey’re probably best dropped. The true world is used ironically to describe the philosopher’s idea of true reality and the religious idea of heaven. Nietzsche thinks it’s a fantasy, not true at all. The four errors include one issue relevant to the topic: he thinks when we confuse cause and consequence in morality, it makes us believe being moral causes happiness, but he doesn’t think that’s true. I think it’s not directly enough connected to the topic, so best left aside.

Note that in this argument he is only rejecting a morality, not rejecting religion or recommending we get rid of religion. He thinks that that his healthier morality is for the few, not for everyone, and even says that it’s good that his own enemies, including the church, exists. So he’s not recommending a view that he thinks everyone should accept.

The introduction should give a very brief but clear and specific statement of each key point in each key section: the criticism, your reply to the critic, the critic’s reply, and your final reply.

The reply to the criticism is a big general, need to more specifically answer the charge that religion doesn’t in fact try to eradicate passion but only prevent excessive passion. Need to compare Nietzsche’s idea of healthy morality as spiritualized passion to religious morality and show that it often fails to do that.

In the next criticism, it’s too close to my email and needs more detail. Put it into your own words: how would they explain that such passions should be totally suppressed. How would they respond to what Nietzsche might think are the benefits to life of those passions? Say more about why they might think a specific passion is both natural and too dangerous to allow, maybe consider examples.

In the final reply, Nietzsche’s view is a little off. He’s not a relativist who thinks morality is whatever anyone says it is. Look at his passage on natural healthy morality, governed by the instincts of life. He believes morality should be tailored to different people according to what helps them moderately and beneficially express their passions, not that it should change with the seasons. You might look at his passage about the enchanting diversity of types, which the moralist tries to make follow one ideal. He wants many different moralities, but they’re not arbitrary, their natural, shaped to promote human health and wellbeing. 

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

READ CAREFULLY AS THE DIRECTIONS ARE DIFFERENT FROM PREVIOUS EXAMS.Answer the mandatory question and then select…

 READ CAREFULLY AS THE DIRECTIONS ARE DIFFERENT FROM PREVIOUS EXAMS.

Answer the mandatory question and then select and answer two out of the six questions presented below. You are required to research and properly cite all references using APA format and may not use your textbook as a cited reference. Please be sure to paraphrase and cite appropriately as you may not quote material from a source. You should submit a total of three answers (one mandatory and two self-selected). Each answer should be a minimum of 250 words, single spaced, and submitted. Please refer to the Essay Exam Rubric for guidelines and expectations.

YOU MUST ANSWER THE MANDATORY QUESTION:

Mandatory question: Over the long scope of the course, one of the central topics discussed has been the contentious history of race relations in the United States. In your essay, please briefly discuss the history of American race relations from post-WWII America through to the present. Touch on some of the major turning points, events, and court cases that help explain the history of race relations. In your answer, discuss where you think the current state of race relations in America stands, and whether you think the civil rights movement achieved the goals it set out to achieve after WWII.

Select and answer TWO out of the six questions presented below:  

  1. During the 1960s, the United States had become a more open, more tolerant – in a word, freer – country. Defend or refute this statement.
  2. Analyze the debate over the Equal Rights Amendment. Who was for it and who was against it? How did each side define freedom for women? What does the debate tell us about American society in the 1970s?
  3. Ultimately, how conservative was Ronald Reagan’s tenure in office? Why might some conservatives feel he did not go far enough, while some liberals felt that he dismantled too much?
  4. Chronicle the story of Native Americans over the past 50 years. How have they been excluded from the definitions of freedom and equality, and how have they petitioned to gain those freedoms?
  5. Analyze how cultural conservatives defined freedom. What arguments did they make in defense of freedom? How valid were their arguments?
  6. George W. Bush commented in his 2001 inaugural address that America had gone out into the world to protect, not to possess, and to defend, not to conquer. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give examples to support your position.

You should answer the Mandatory Question and two of the six choices before the due date.

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on how museums, galleries, or historical sites…

 The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on how museums, galleries, or historical sites tell New Mexico’s history and its stories. Some of these places might emphasize certain interpretations and facts that they feel are important, while other place may highlight different aspects of the same event. Like stories, history is not objective: it is always told from a particular point of view.  With that in mind choose ONE online museum website focused on any aspect of New Mexican history, try looking for themes releated to your final paper or choose one of the websites listed below. Make sure you spend some time browsing through the website, click on the links.

Then provide a detailed response to the 3 following prompts:

 Write your responses in an essay format not as separate responses to each prompt:

1. Start by indicating what is the website about, You can address for instance: what type of issues is the website focusing on: social, political, visuals, etc… and/or which issues are left out, explain why this might be?  What do you think is the target audience? What are some strengths and shortcomings of this website? Are there any problems with this website, for instance, is it historically accurate? Take a look at the sources used for this website, what is gained or lost by relying on the sources listed and by not including other accounts? 

2. Secondly, what issues, information, documents, or evidence would you delete, edit, and/or add, and why are those revisions important, do they tell a different story, more accurate or focused on what aspects? How would these revisions improve this website?  

3. Finally, include a brief conclusion reflecting on what does the website tell us about the theme/topic/event it focuses on or how does it expand our understanding of such themes/topics? For example, if you only had the information provided by this website, what conclusion would you come to regarding the topic or issues it addresses?

Some Website links on New Mexico:Draw National Historic Landmark and Museum

https://www.bwdarchaeology.com/

New Mexico True  Click on places to go by trails, Native American, region, city, ghost towns, etc…

https://www.newmexico.org/

New Mexico Historic Sites

http://www.nmhistoricsites.org/

National Park Services- New Mexico

https://www.nps.gov/state/nm/index.htm

New Mexico History.org Multimedia

http://newmexicohistory.org/multimedia

Santa Fe Museums- list of 14 museums, click on one of them

https://www.santafenm.gov/museums_events_attractions

New Mexico Museum of Space History

http://www.nmspacemuseum.org/

 Also how does this read to you. Does this make you want to go visit? Did you find it interesting or boring? 

Should be MLA format and 2 pages

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by