Grammar and Punctuation Check Due: Thursday, 11:59pm (your time zone) Word count: N/A…

 

Grammar and Punctuation Check

  • Due: Thursday, 11:59pm (your time zone)
  • Word count: N/A
  • Grading: 10 points
  • Peer response: N/A

The best way to learn grammar and punctuation rules is to read through a grammar book and then find errors in your own paper.

Please read the  "Edit"  section in The Little Seagull Handbook.  You don't have to read every page,  but if you know that you often have problems with semicolons,  read the section on semicolons.  If you don't know how to properly use a dash,  read up on dashes.  Also,  read through some sections that you may not have read before.  Are you making any errors because you didn't know a rule existed?

Find three rules that you didn't know about or were using incorrectly.  Provide the name of the rule below along with its page number,  and then quote the sentence from your paper where you misused the rule.  Write a corrected version below.

Example:

Page 259: Comma Splice. "When clauses are linked by a transition such as therefore or as a result, the transition needs to be preceded by a semicolon and followed by a comma."

Incorrect version

It is a good idea to proofread your paper, however it is better to proofread with a grammar guide by your side.

Corrected version

It is a good idea to proofread your paper; however,  it is better to proofread with a grammar guide by your side.

Don't forget,  post three rules and three examples from your paper,  not just one.

2- 

Discuss Your Revision Process

  • Due: Wednesday, 11:59pm (your time zone)
  • Word limit: N/A
  • Grading: 10 points
  • Peer response: Respond to two peers
    • Due: Saturday, 11:59pm (your time zone)
    • Word limit: 50 words minimum, each 

First, reflect on the feedback you received in Week Three Discussion 4 from your three classmates. Identify the two suggestions which you believe will be most valuable in helping you improve your draft and explain why.

Then, re-read your Week Three draft and review the prompt for Week Three Discussion 4, "Peer Review."

  1. What two Global Comments do you feel are most relevant to the improvements your draft needs?
  2. Compose an answer to the questions for both Global Comments you select. For example, if you chose the Global Comment "Do the introduction and conclusion do the job they are supposed to?" explain what "parts" of the introduction and/or conclusion are left out.

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

RESUMEAssignment:Your assignment is to create a professional resume and a letter of application usingMicrosoft Office…

   

RESUME

Assignment:

Your assignment is to create a professional resume and a letter of application usingMicrosoft Office Word or a similar word-processing program. 

Explanation:

You may or may not already have a resume. If you have a resume, your job is to polish and update it. If you do not have a resume, then your job is to create one. Even though there are two main types of resumes (chronological and functional), I prefer that you use the chronological approach as it is the most advantageous for new graduates. 

Purpose:

Today’s job market for college professionals is perhaps more competitive than it has ever been. Jobs are posted and filled at such a rapid rate that it is important to always be prepared. This assignment is about being prepared for a job opportunity when it arises. 

AND ALSO  Letter of Application

1. Read the section in our textbook that relates to writing effective application letters

2. Locate a job posting from any website (but it must relate to your field of study). There are a number of job search engines in your text. 

3. Use a letterhead template from Word to draft your application (cover) letter

4. Adhere to the basic pattern of an application letter

5. Make certain that your letter of application matches the qualifications and requirements of the job posting that you possess (one way to accomplish this is to highlight key terms in the post and make certain you have used them in your letter)

6. Turn in your letter of application in the appropriate eCampus portal 

Rubric: Resume—I will be looking for the following assessed at 20 pts each:

1. Style (chronological and no more than 2 pages; although, a single page is preferred)

2. Design and Alignment (clean with sufficient white-space)

3. Inclusions (those items listed on page 320 of your text)

4. Grammar/Usage/Mechanics (no one will take a second look at a resume with these errors)

5. Your related work experience begins with verb phrases (listed in your text)

Rubric: Letter of Application—I will be looking for the following assessed at 20 pts each:

1. Content (Is the information provided appropriate to the job posting)

2. Organization (Only 1 page.)

3. Design (clean with sufficient white-space)

4. Style (conveys a sense of your own personality and your interest in the job)

5. Grammar/Usage/Mechanics (same as above) 

 

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

To those not familiar with the conventions of academic writing, citation styles may be a…

 

To those not familiar with the conventions of academic writing, citation styles may be a bit confusing. First, what is a citation style and why do we use it? As I noted in the Week Two lecture, American academic traditions put a great value on intellectual property i.e. giving credit where credit is due.

As academic discourse is all about conversations, a big part of most papers is giving our readers an idea of the history of the conversation at hand, so they can go back and read the conversation that the writer is referencing. In that way, academic citation is a sort of courtesy to fellow scholars.

But most importantly, as mentioned above, citation is a way to give credit to those who deserve credit. To take someone else's words and use them as our own is one of the highest offenses in academia, especially in scholarly work, so citation is a way of showing due respect to those we have quoted and giving them credit for their ideas and words. On the other side of the coin, proper citation is a way to protect ourselves from claims that we have unfairly appropriated any intellectual material from others.

One of the confusing things about citation is that there are so many different citation styles. Citation styles are just different ways of citing used by different groups of academics. The citation style we will be using in this class is MLA citation style. MLA stands for "Modern Language Association." It the basic citation style for most of the humanities. Another common citation style is APA. This is the citation style of the "American Psychological Association." It is used in many sciences and social sciences. There are other citation styles as well.

The reason there are different citation styles is because they reflect the different values of their respective fields. APA style, for example, puts more stress on the year of publication than MLA style because in the sciences how recent the study or paper was published is of more importance than in the humanities. Also, APA style often includes an abstract of the paper. This is important in the sciences, but in the humanities often times papers cannot be summarized as easily; therefore, abstracts are not used.

MLA In-Text Citation – Instructions

1. Post one of the paragraphs from your paper (preferably one that uses many quotes) with proper MLA style in-text citation.

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

Now that we know the stages of critical thinking and have a better understanding of…

  

Now that we know the stages of critical thinking and have a better understanding of how to improve, we need to think about how we will measure our progress.  What types of standards will we need to hold our thinking to in order to ensure we are thinking critically?  What types of questions can we ask ourselves to double check our thinking?  Paul & Elder (2012) give us the basic, universal standards and as a reminder, I have them listed here:

· Clarity

· accuracy

· precision

· relevance

· depth

· breadth

· logic

· significance

· Fairness

Which are the ones that you think you currently struggle in terms of meeting in your thinking (in other words, what would be your areas of opportunity)?  Why did you choose what you did and how can you go about beginning to fix it?

References:

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Last week, we looked at the influence that outside sources like family, friends, and the media have on our ability to think critically.  We've also spent the last week reviewing how we should evaluate our evidence sources to ensure they are reliable and credible.  This week, we will look specifically at the media and how what they deliver may not be as objective and bias free as you would hope.

Paul & Elder (2012) give us a list of myths that you may or may not believe about various forms of media.  Those myths include:

· that most news stories are produced through independent investigative journalism

· that news writers simply report facts in their stories and do not come to conclusions about them

· that fact and opinion are clearly separated in constructing the news

· that there is an objective reality (the actual "news") that is simply "reported" or described by the news media of the world (our news media writers reporting on this objectively; the media of foreign enemies systematically slanting and distorting it)

· that what is unusual (novel, odd, bizarre) is news; what is usual is not (Paul & Elder, 2012)

Class, do you agree with these myths? Why or why not? Are there any that surprise you? Why?

References:

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Words: 227

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

INSTRUCTIONS:For this assignment, you are to read a primary source related to the content of…

INSTRUCTIONS:

For this assignment, you are to read a primary source related to the content of the lecture in this module. Upon completion of the reading, you will need to complete a reading response journal. Reading response journals provide opportunities to practice understanding and evaluation of philosophical conceptions of the good life we consider in the course; these opportunities, along with feedback received, will prepare you for the analysis and evaluation component of the final project.

After reading "Life on the Slippery Earth"  reflect on the ideas, arguments, conceptions, and perspectives offered by Purcell. Consider one of them that you find intriguing, compelling, or important to your understanding of the reading. In doing so, ponder the specific reasons for why you find it intriguing, compelling, or important. Possible considerations to contemplate is the strength of an argument in terms of its validity, its truthfulness in terms of evidence that can support it, its coherence with other ideas presented in the reading, its relatability to your own life (especially the specific values and beliefs you hold–not just a story about how one time…), and how it compares with other philosophical perspectives you have encountered elsewhere. Be sure to explain the argument you choose, define philosophical concepts that you use, and provide examples to support your points. Your explanation should include textual support with citations; any citation style can be used so long as the page number of the quote or paraphrase is provided. To earn full credit and have appropriate philosophical depth, your response should be at least 400 words. Use the rubric below to ensure your entry is complete. 

READING: https://aeon.co/essays/aztec-moral-philosophy-didnt-expect-anyone-to-be-a-saint (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

GRADING POLICY:

There will be a total of 11 journal entries; the lowest score will be dropped when calculating the final grade. This results in 10 journal entries, each being worth 4% of the final grade. 6 entries will be graded as credit/no credit and 5 entries will be graded according to the rubric. You will not know in advance which entries will be graded credit/no credit and which entries will be graded with the rubric; as such, entries should be completed with the expectation that the rubric could be used.

Use the rubric below to ensure your entry is complete. 

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

1- Locate main claims in a variety of articles Reading comprehension via active…

1-

 

  • Locate main claims in a variety of articles
  •  Reading comprehension via active reading
  •  Research gaps and discourse patterns
  •  Explore responses to existing conversations
  •  Using brainstorming to enter the conversation 

While reading, read actively. This means you must read slowly, rereading difficult passages and taking notes on questions and ideas that cross your mind. You will need a highlighter and a pen. While reading, highlight passages from the texts and write notes next to them. These notes can be any of your thoughts, whether you agree, disagree, have questions, or qualifications.

Write three quotes that you highlighted. Note the article, author, and page number. After the quote, write down your notes or thoughts about the passage.

Each of your three entries will look something like this:

Carter, Phillip M. “Why This Bilingual Education Ban Should Have Repealed Long Ago.”
"Millions of Spanish-speaking immigrant students lost the opportunity to learn or retain valuable literacy skills in Spanish while they acquired English. And, millions of California-born Latinos who enrolled in school with the gift of native bilingualism would later leave school unable to read and write in Spanish."
Comment: I felt this comment reflects the biggest flaw with English-only instruction. In trying to solve one problem it actually creates two by hampering the student's ability to learn a new language and not encouraging a skill (being bilingual) which is really important to have, especially in California. With the Hispanic population in America continuing to grow, it seems important to have Spanish as a second language.

The point of this assignment is to find out what you might have to add to the conversation. It will help you come up with possible claims in your next assignment.

4 0r 5 question answer about our topic.

2-

 

 

  • Use effective summary
  •  Use paraphrase effectively

Write a summary for paper

Choose one article from the readings to summarize. Try to choose the article with which you are conversing the most. Keep your claim in mind. When you use summary in your papers, you will only want to focus on what is relevant to your claim. Think, "What part of the conversation do I need to recreate for my audience so they will understand my claim?"

To help compose your summary, read the following:

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/symposium.htmlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0_NZt9fOLQ&t=3s(1) Read the Symposium carefully and watch the lectures(2) Pick two of the speeches that…

http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/symposium.html

(1) Read the Symposium carefully and watch the lectures

(2) Pick two of the speeches that you found interesting and use them to respond to the following prompt:(a) In your own words, explain the basic content of the two speeches. This brief summary should be no more than 300 words for the two speeches combined. You should try to summarize very concisely the theory of love in each of the two speeches. In your summary, you should compare the two speeches.(b) Once you've summarized the two speeches, develop your own analysis by responding to the following questions:(i) How would you define romantic love? Is romantic love natural or is it something created by culture? How have modern technologies, such as Facebook and online dating, transformed romantic love? Have they destroyed love, or made it more accesible to people? Is love something that can be planned for, or does it always happen spontaneously, by chance? Use the the concepts developed in the two speeches to answer these questions, and then include your own thoughts about it. Use the speeches as a starting point, and then include your own thoughts about love. This part should be at least 750 words.
(ii) Once you've answered a and b.i, discuss the following: when was the first time you were in love? How does Plato's Symposium help you understand your own experience better? For this portion, you can give a little bit of autobiography, and then use what you wrote in the previous sections to analyze and think critically about your own experience. This part should be at least 350 words.
(3) In one short paragraph, summarize what you wrote about and list at least 3 conclusionsGuidelines
Should be 3-4 pagesDouble spaced
Times New Roman
12 point font
Follow all word-length requirements (listed in each section)
VERY IMPORTANT:Please do not include any quotes from the text or from secondary sources. All quotations will receive a 5 point deduction. I am only interested in what you have to say. Just refer to the text and discuss it.
Do NOT include a works cited page, since you won't be quoting the text. I know which text you are using and referring to, so there is no need for a works cited page. 

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

Part 3: Explanation and DefenseIn this section, you will explain and defend your argument by…

Part 3: Explanation and Defense

In this section, you will explain and defend your argument by drawing on the moral theory that aligns most closely with the argument you presented in Part 2. This may be the same theory you discussed in your second assignment, but it may also be a different theory.

  • You must first explain the theory in general terms similar to how you explained a theory in your second assignment, including a brief account of the historical background of the theory and the philosopher(s) associated with it and general overview of the core moral ideal or principle of the theory, including the way it guides and constrains moral reasoning.
  • You should then clearly show how your argument represents an application of that form of moral reasoning.
  • In other words, if the argument you present in Part 2 is utilitarian, deontological, or virtue-based (teleological), you will want to explain utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics in general terms, then explain how your argument from Part 2 reflects or draws upon the core principles and values of that theory. Please refer to the Week 3 assignment instructions for directions on how to explain and apply the moral theory.

Place this section under the Part 3: Explanation and Defense heading.

Part 4: Objection and Response

In this section of the paper, you will present the strongest objection you can to your argument, and briefly defend that objection by appealing to a different ethical theory than the one you focused on in Part 3.

  • Briefly explain the core moral ideal or principle of the theory and how that could be the basis of an objection to your argument. For instance, if you explained and defended your own argument by applying the principles of virtue ethics, you could raise an objection from the perspective of utilitarianism by briefly explaining the core utilitarian principle and how applying that principle could lead someone to a different conclusion than the one you are defending.
  • Next, you should respond to the objection by explaining why it is not strong enough to undermine the main argument in defense of your position.
  • See the assignment guidance for suggestions on how to effectively respond to the objection.

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

please follow the instractions you will use the Referential Aim and the Mode of Formal Classification…

please follow the instractions

 you will use the Referential Aim and the Mode of Formal Classification or Narration of Process to write an essay of at least 1000 words.  For this essay, you will take a group of things and relate them to each other; or take a process, divide it up into a series of steps, and relate the steps.   

Because your essay is referential, you must be comprehensive.  That is, you must talk about ALL the kinds of something or ALL the steps involved in doing something.  Your thesis MUST include all of your categories/steps.  You must have at least three and not more than seven categories/steps.  You must use direct support for your thesis.   

You must include quotes and citations from at least five (5) outside sources.  Only three (3) of these sources may be web-based.  The rest of your sources MUST be text-based.  You must have a quote or paraphrase and a citation from an outside source for all of your categories.  You must include a Works Cited page. 

A) For the First Draft of Paper 4, you will turn in your introduction and first body paragraph section.   

  1. Your first body paragraph section must contain a quote/paraphrase and an MLA style citation.   
  2. In addition, you must do an MLA Work Cited entry for the source(s) you cite in your first body paragraph.  This Work Cited entry (or entries) should appear directly below your prose paragraphs.   

B) For the Final Draft of Paper 4, which will consist of a typed, double-spaced essay that includes a Works Cited page, you must:  

  1. Clearly state your thesis in your introduction.   
  2. Include all of your categories/steps in your thesis statement. 
  3. Have at least three and not more than seven categories/steps, each of which must be developed in a separate two-body-paragraph section of your essay. 
  4. Use topic sentences to begin all of your body paragraphs, and transitions to begin each section. 
  5. Relate your categories/steps to each other in some clear, consistent way.   
  6. Quote and cite at least five sources, only three of which may be web-based. 
  7. Include a Works Cited page.   

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by

Your work with UWEAR and PALEDENIM is coming to closure. You have sent an e-mail…

Your work with UWEAR and PALEDENIM is coming to closure. You have sent an e-mail to the client requesting feedback on any final requests before you close the project. Teresa Tramlin, the chief executive officer (CEO), has sent you the following e-mail in response:

It has been a pleasure working with you on this project. For your final deliverable, we are requesting a comprehensive change management framework that we can use to build upon as we move forward. We realize that there is much to do to create the culture we envision and build allegiance to the merged organization. Mike and I need to fully understand our role as leaders as well as help our managers understand their role in building employee commitment. We look forward to your recommendation regarding strategies and tactics to successfully complete the merger, navigate through change, and align personnel, culminating in an effective, successful organization.

As you reflect on this final deliverable, you realize that the new values-driven culture, including the code of conduct, represents just part of the change faced by the newly merged organization. Other areas of change include, but are not limited to, work roles, reporting structure, and key business processes.

Assignment

Recommend a change strategy and process for Theresa and Mike to follow. Applying concepts from this unit and prior units in the course, create your recommendation for Theresa and Mike that addresses, but is not limited to, the following: 

  • Overall change management model, such as Lewin, Kotter, or ADKAR
    • Explain the value of this model for the UWEAR-PALEDENIM scenario.
    • Recommend specific actions related to application of the selected model.
  • Managing the people side of change, including resistance
  • Key leadership and management behaviors for effective change
  • Identify topics about which you would like additional information to fully respond to the request for the change management framework. Research peer-reviewed journals in the library to learn more about those areas. Apply concepts from at least 2 articles that you researched to the development of your recommendation.

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

/0 Comments/by