When Brian failed to provide Taylor, his minor child, with adequate food and clothing, Quality Clothing provided Taylor with clothing and a neighbor fed him. State law of the state in which Brian and Taylor live provides that a father is required to provide support for his minor children. Could Quality successfully maintain a cause of action in restitution for the clothing provided? Explain. Why or why not. Please support your stance with a full discussion of the issues. Please list your references. Could the neighbor successfully maintain a cause of action in restitution for feeding Taylor? Explain. Why or why not. What are the differences, if any, between what the neighbor did for Taylor and what Quality Clothing did for Taylor? Please support your stance with a full discussion of the issues. Please list your references.
Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here
